Article: Wednesday, 6 December 2017

During exchanges of ideas about the energy transition, large-scale incumbents in the energy sector are often referred to as a delaying factor. The parties concerned claim that these incumbents are having difficulty in abandoning use of fossil fuels. PhD student Gerbert Hengelaar of Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University (RSM) studied the formation of the Energy Agreement in 2013 and discovered that contrary to expectation, these incumbents fulfilled a crucial role in accelerating the transition by forming coalitions.

After many years of implementing a rapid succession of policy changes with effect from 2000, the government, the business sector and environmental groups began to feel an urgent need for stability and a clear long-term vision round about 2010, according to Hengelaar. The Ministry of Economic Affairs subsequently decided to ask as many of these parties as possible - a total of 47 - to enter into negotiations for the purpose of arriving at an energy agreement enjoying widespread public support.

Hengelaar was keen to find out what role large-scale power companies such as Eneco and Essent played in this respect, in view of their vested interests and the influence they had built up over the years. He analysed 1345 newspaper articles to discover how exactly the negotiations had proceeded. This served to elucidate the precise ideological position adopted by each party, as well as how (and why) these positions shifted over time. He also examined what influence these positions had on the coalitions formed among all the lobbyists during the proceedings.

In addition, this group - together with the ‘pro-environment’ coalition - lobbied successfully for measures that would ensure greater energy saving in buildings.

Core values

First of all, Hengelaar studied the relatively constant core values at each company: what exactly were they in favour of in respect of energy transition? He established five separate visions in this respect: pro-decentralisation (diminished government involvement), pro-environment, green growth (sustainable growth creates jobs), clean fossil fuels and ‘pro-economy’. The power companies used these ideological foundations as a basis for seeking like-minded parties and forming coalitions with them.

From Hengelaar’s analysis, it emerged that most of the incumbents in the energy sector were mainly in favour of clean fossil fuels, and that their preferred partners shared this view. This discovery was not entirely surprising. But it also emerged that a number of statements made by these companies in general - and by Eneco in particular - could be classified under the heading of ‘green growth’: at least 84% of Eneco’s statements could be traced back to the ‘green growth’ idea.

And that is how Eneco ended up in a coalition with like-minded banks such as Triodos and ASN, and with environmental organisations like Greenpeace. The fact that these unlikely partners joined forces meant that they succeeded in getting their ambition of a substantial increase in wind power production at sea included in the definitive Energy Agreement. In addition, this group - together with the ‘pro-environment’ coalition - lobbied successfully for measures that would ensure greater energy saving in buildings. This example of Eneco’s attitude shows us that contrary to popular belief, incumbents can still play a major role in establishing a more sustainable energy policy.

According to Hengelaar, this research also demonstrates that the influence wielded by incumbents in the energy sector goes much further than ‘merely’ investing in sustainable technology: they have a considerable say in the public debate, and they also play a large part in policy-making. And it is this very policy that often constitutes the deciding factor in transitions. Hengelaar added that the fact that proactive incumbents in the energy sector join forces with green parties, as Eneco has done with the ‘green growth’ coalition, is a very important point in breaking through the closed ranks of the energy and industrial sectors. It means that incumbents in the energy sector no longer have to be an inhibiting factor in the energy transition; on the contrary, they can reinforce and broaden public support for this transition, Hengelaar concludes.

Dr. Gerbert Hengelaar

Transition & business strategist


Profile picture of Dr. Gerbert Hengelaar
Pile of books with vibrant bookmarks protruding from various pages, symbolizing in-depth research.
Header image for RSM Discovery, representing the research stories and articles section of the Rotterdam School of Management website.

RSM Discovery

RSM's Research stories in a fun and accessible format. Read the latest insights from the best researchers in the field of business. You can also subscribe to the newsletter to receive a bimonthly highlight with the most popular articles.
  • Subscribe to the newsletter

Want to learn more about this subject?

RSM offers Executive Education and Master programmes in various business areas for any stage of your career. For instance:

Last seats

Leading Change

3-day programme

Young woman posing in front of De Rotterdam, Rotterdam's iconic modern skyscraper.

Personal brand effectiveness

3-day programme

Elegant man posing in front of the Erasmus Bridge in Rotterdam

Corporate Responsibility

3-day programme

Elegant man holding a skyline of skyscrapers connected to a globe in his palm, symbolizing corporate responsibility.
Portrait of Erika Harriford-McLaren

Erika Harriford-McLaren

Corporate Communications & PR Manager

Danielle Baan

Science Communication and Media Officer

Erasmus University campus in autumn, showcasing its iconic red trees, viewed from across the campus pool.