Rotterdam school of Management, Erasmus University compact logo

More information

Profile

Marius van Dijke is professor of behavioral ethics at Rotterdam School of Management (RSM), Erasmus University. He currently serves as head of the department of Business-Society Management. His research is concerned with behavioral ethics and leadership of high integrity. Examples of issues he examines in his research include when power stimulates moral and immoral behavior, why people so deeply value social justice, and what the role is of intuitive and controlled processes in moral judgment and behavior. These issues have important implications both for theory and practice, supplying tools that stimulate employees and managers to function both productively and ethically. He has published widely on these topics in Management and Psychology journals, for instance in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Journal of Management, Journal of Applied Psychology, Leadership Quarterly, and Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. Marius served as Director of Doctoral Education of the Erasmus Research Institute  of Management from April 2015 until December 2017. 

Publications

Academic (74)
  • Leunissen, J. M., van Dijke, M., Wildschut, T., & Sedikides, C. (2024). Organizational Nostalgia: The Construct, the Scale and its Implications for Organizational Functioning. British Journal of Management, 35(2), 816-838. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12740

  • Versteegt, L., van Dijke, M., & van den Bos, K. (2024). Physical distancing during the COVID-19 crisis: The roles of threat and moralization. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 54(3), 162-174. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.13021

  • Brockner, J., & van Dijke, M. (2024). Work engagement and burnout in anticipation of physically returning to work: The interactive effect of imminence of return and self-affirmation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 110, Article 104527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104527

  • van Houwelingen, G., & van Dijke, M. (2023). Investing to gain others’ trust: Cognitive abstraction increases prosocial behavior and trust received from others. PLoS ONE, 18(4 April), Article e0284500. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284500

  • van Dijke, M., & Leunissen, J. M. (2023). Nostalgia in organizations. Current Opinion in Psychology, 49, Article 101540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101540

  • Haesevoets, T., De Cremer, D., De Schutter, L., van Dijke, M., Young, H. R., Lee, H. W., Johnson, R., & Chiang, J. T.-J. (2022). The impact of leader depletion on leader performance: the mediating role of leaders' trust beliefs and employees' citizenship behaviors. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 20676. Article 20676. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-24882-3

  • Versteegt, L., van Dijke, M., van Ruysseveldt, J., & van den Bos, K. (2022). When Employees Experience Low Levels of Job Autonomy, Fair Procedures Buffer Unfair Outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 784853. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.784853

  • van Houwelingen, G., van Dijke, M., Hoogervorst, N., Meijs, L., & De Cremer, D. (2022). Two Sides of the Same Coin: Punishment and Forgiveness in Organizational Contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 908021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.908021

  • van Quaquebeke, N., Salem, M., van Dijke, M., & Wenzel, R. (2022). Conducting organizational survey and experimental research online: From convenient to ambitious in study designs, recruiting, and data quality. Organizational Psychology Review, 12(3), 268-305. https://doi.org/10.1177/20413866221097571

  • Haesevoets, T., De Cremer, D., Hirst, G., De Schutter, L., Stouten, J., van Dijke, M., & Van Hiel, A. (2022). The Effect of Decisional Leader Procrastination on Employee Innovation: Investigating the Moderating Role of Employees’ Resistance to Change. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 29(1), 131-146. https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518211044166

  • Giurge, L.-M., Dijke, M., Zheng, X., & De Cremer, D. (2021). Does Power Corrupt the Mind? The Influence of Power on Moral Reasoning and Self-Interested Behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.03.003

  • Reinders Folmer, C. P., De Cremer, D., Wubben, M., & van Dijke, M. (2020). We can’t go on together with suspicious minds: Forecasting errors in evaluating the appreciation of denials. Journal of Trust Research, 10(1), 4-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2020.1738944

  • Dijke, M. (2020). Power and leadership. Current Opinion in Psychology, 33, 6-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.012

  • Sheppard, L., O'Reilly, J., Dijke, M., Restubog, S., & Aquino, K. (2020). The Stress-Relieving Benefits of Positively-Experienced Social Sexual Behavior in the Workplace. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 156, 38-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.09.002

  • Zheng, X., & Dijke, M. (2020). Expressing Forgiveness after Interpersonal Mistreatment: Power and Status of Forgivers Influence Transgressors’ Relationship Restoration Efforts. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(8), 782-796. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2432

  • Dijke, M., Leunissen, JM., Wildschut, T., & Sedikides, C. (2019). Nostalgia Promotes Intrinsic Motivation and Effort in the Presence of Low Interactional Justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 150, 46-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.12.003

  • Dijke, M., Gobena, L., & Verboon, P. (2019). Make me want to pay! A three-way interaction between procedural justice, distributive justice, and power on voluntary tax compliance. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 1632. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01632

  • De Cremer, D., Dijke, M., Schminke, M., De Schutter, L., & Stouten, J. (2018). The trickle-down effects of perceived trustworthiness on subordinate performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(12), 1335-1357. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000339

  • Zheng, X., Yuan, Y., Dijke, M., De Cremer, D., & Van Hiel, A. (2018). The Interactive Effect of a Leader’s Sense of Uniqueness and Sense of Belongingness on Followers’ Perceptions of Leader Authenticity. Journal of Business Ethics, 164, 515-533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4070-4

  • Houwelingen, G., Dijke, M., & De Cremer, D. (2018). Trust maintenance as a function of construal level and attributions: the case of apologies. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2291

  • van Dijke, M., van Houwelingen, G., De Cremer, D., & De Schutter, L. (2018). So Gross and Yet so Far Away: Psychological Distance Moderates the Effect of Disgust on Moral Judgment. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(6), 689-701. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617722198, https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617722198

  • Dijke, M., De Cremer, D., Langendijk, G., & Anderson, C. (2018). Ranking low, feeling high: How hierarchical position and experienced power promote prosocial behavior in response to procedural justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(2), 164-181. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000260

  • Zheng, X., Dijke, M., Narayanan, J., & De Cremer, D. (2017). When expressing forgiveness backfires in the workplace: Victim power moderates the effect of expressing forgiveness on transgressor compliance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27(1), 70-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2017.1392940

  • Houwelingen, G., van Dijke, M., & De Cremer, D. (2017). Fairness Enactment as Response to Higher Level Unfairness. The Roles of Self-Construal and Spatial Distance. Journal of Management, 43(2), 319-347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314530166

  • Gobena, L. B., & van Dijke, M. (2017). Fear and caring: Procedural justice, trust, and collective identification as antecedents of voluntary tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 62(October), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2017.05.005

  • Zheng, X., van Dijke, M., Leunissen, J. M., Giurge, L.-M., & De Cremer, D. (2016). When saying sorry may not help: Transgressor power moderates the effect of an apology on forgiveness in the workplace. Human Relations, 69(6), 1387-1418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715611236

  • Gobena, L. B., & van Dijke, M. (2016). Power, justice, and trust: A moderated mediation analysis of voluntary tax compliance among Ethiopian small business owners. Journal of Economic Psychology, 52(February), 24-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2015.11.004

  • Desmet, P., Hoogervorst, N., & van Dijke, M. (2015). Prophets vs. profits: How market competition influences leaders' disciplining behavior towards ethical transgressions. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(6), 1034-1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.07.004

  • van Dijke, M., De Cremer, D., Brebels, LGG., & van Quaquebeke, N. (2015). Willing and Able: Action-State Orientation and the relation between Procedural Justice and Employee Cooperation. Journal of Management, 41(7), 1982-2003. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313478187

  • van Gils, S., van Quaquebeke, N., van Knippenberg, D., van Dijke, M., & De Cremer, D. (2015). Ethical leadership and follower organizational deviance: The moderating role of follower moral attentiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 26, 190-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.08.005

  • Bianchi, E., Brockner, J., van den Bos, K., Seifert, M., Moon, H., van Dijke, M., & De Cremer, D. (2015). Trust in decision-making authorities dictates the form of the interactive relationship between outcome favorability and procedural fairness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(1), 19-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214556237

  • van Dijke, M., Wildschut, T., Leunissen, J. M., & Sedikides, C. (2015). Nostalgia Buffers the Negative Impact of Low Procedural Justice on Cooperation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 127(March), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.11.005

  • Joosten, A., van Dijke, M., Van Hiel, A., & De Cremer, D. (2015). Out of control!? How loss of self-control influences prosocial behavior: the role of power and moral values. PLoS One (online), 10(5), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126377

  • Houwelingen, G., van Dijke, M., & De Cremer, D. (2015). Getting it done and getting it right: Leader disciplinary reactions to followers' moral transgressions are determined by leader's construal level mindset. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(5), 878-891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.06.007

  • Joosten, A., van Dijke, M., Van Hiel, A., & De Cremer, D. (2014). Being `in Control' May Make You Lose control: The Role of Self-Regulation in Unethical Leadership Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1686-2

  • Joosten, A., van Dijke, M., Van Hiel, A., & De Cremer, D. (2014). Feel good, do-good!? On consistency and compensation in moral self-regulation. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(1), 71-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1794-z

  • Leunissen, JM., De Cremer, D., van Dijke, M., & Reinders Folmer, C. (2014). Forecasting Errors in the Averseness of an Apology. Social Justice Research, 27(3), 322-339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-014-0216-4

  • Desmet, P., Hoogervorst, N., & van Dijke, M. (2014). Prophets vs. Profits: How Market Competition Influences Leader's Disciplining Behavior. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2014(1), Article 15818. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2014.119

  • Cramwinckel, FM., De Cremer, D., & van Dijke, M. (2013). Dirty hands make dirty leaders?! How the touching of dirty objects leads to higher rewards for unethical followers. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(1), 93-100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1385-4

  • Hoogervorst, N., De Cremer, D., & van Dijke, M. (2013). When do Leaders Grant Voice? How Leaders' Perceptions of Followers' Control and Belongingness Needs Affect the Enactment of Fair Procedures. Human Relations, 66(7), 973-992. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713482150

  • Stouten, J., van Dijke, M., Mayer, D., De Cremer, D., & Euwema, M. (2013). Can a leader be seen as too ethical? The curvilinear effects of ethical leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(5), 680-695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.05.002

  • van Ruysseveldt, J., & van Dijke, M. (2012). Wanneer bevordert en wanneer hindert werkdruk het werkplekleren? Gedrag en Organisatie, 25(1), 28-44.

  • Proost, K., Van Ruysseveldt, J., & van Dijke, M. (2012). Coping with unmet expectations: Learning opportunities as a buffer against emotional exhaustion and turnover intentions. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21(1), 7-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2010.526304

  • Hoogervorst, N., De Cremer, D., van Dijke, M., & Mayer, D. M. (2012). When do leaders sacrifice? The effects of sense of power and belongingness on leader self-sacrifice. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 883-896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.05.006

  • Geenen, B., Proost, K., van Dijke, M., De Witte, K., & von Grumbkow, J. (2012). The role of affect in the relationship between distributive justice expectations and applicants' recommendation and litigation intentions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 20(4), 404-413. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12003

  • Verboon, P., & van Dijke, M. (2012). The effect of perceived deterrence on compliance with authorities: The moderating influence of procedural justice. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 1, 151-161. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2012.01.15

  • Verboon, P., & van Dijke, M. (2011). When do severe sanctions enhance compliance? The role of procedural fairness. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(1), 120-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2010.09.007

  • Brebels, LGG., De Cremer, D., van Dijke, M., & Van Hiel, A. (2011). Fairness as social responsibility: a moral self-regulation account of procedural justice enactment. British Journal of Management, 22(SI), S47-S58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00715.x

  • De Cremer, D., Brockner, J., Fishman, A., van Dijke, M., van Olffen, W., & Mayer, DM. (2010). When do procedural fairness and outcome fairness interact to influence employees' work attitudes and behaviors? The moderation effect of uncertainty. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(2), 291-304. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017866

  • van Dijke, M., De Cremer, D., & Mayer, D. (2010). The role of authority power in explaining procedural fairness effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 488-502. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018921

  • van Dijke, M., & Verboon, P. (2010). Trust in authorities as a boundary condition to procedural fairness effects on tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(1), 80-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2009.10.005

  • van Dijke, M., & De Cremer, D. (2010). Procedural fairness and endorsement of prototypical leaders: Leader benevolence or follower control? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(1), 85-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.10.004

  • De Cremer, D., van Dijke, M., & Mayer, D. M. (2010). Cooperating when "you" and "I" are treated fairly: The moderating role of leader prototypicality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1121-1133. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020419

  • De Cremer, D., Tenbrunsel, A., & van Dijke, M. (2010). Regulating Ethical Failures: Insights from Psychology. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(supplement 1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0789-x

  • Hoogervoorst, N., De Cremer, D., & van Dijke, M. (2010). Why Leaders Not Always Disapprove of Unethical Follower Behavior: It depends on the leader's self-interest and accountability. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(supplement 1), 29-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0793-1

  • van Dijke, M., De Cremer, D., Schefferlie, P., & Bos, AER. (2009). Procedural and interpersonal fairness moderate the relationship between outcome fairness and acceptance of merit pay. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 18(1), 8-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320701856699

  • Langendijk, G., van Dijke, M., & De Cremer, D. (2009). How power and trust explain procedural fairness effects on self-esteem. Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 65, 118-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03080134

  • De Cremer, D., Mayer, D. M., van Dijke, M., Schouten, B. C., & Bardes, M. (2009). When does self-sacrificial leadership motivate prosocial behavior? It depends on followers¿ prevention focus. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 887-899. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014782

  • De Cremer, D., & van Dijke, M. (2009). On the psychology of justice as a social regulation tool. Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 65(4), 114-117. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03080133

  • De Cremer, D., van Dijke, M., Brebels, LGG., & Hoogervorst, N. (2008). How intergroup dynamics influence within-group cooperation: The case of prototypical leadership and procedural fairness. Psychologica Belgica, 48, 157-175. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb-48-2-3-157

  • van Dijke, M., & De Cremer, D. (2008). How leader prototypicality influences followers’ status: The role of procedural fairness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17(2), 226-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320701743491

  • Van Prooijen, J. W., De Cremer, D., Van Beest, I., Stahl, T., van Dijke, M., & Van Lange, P. (2008). The egocentric nature of procedural justice: Social value orientation as moderator of reactions to decision-making procedures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1303-1315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.05.006

  • De Cremer, D., van Dijke, M., & Bos, AER. (2007). When leaders are seen as transformational: The effects of organizational justice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(8), 1797-1816. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00238.x

  • Bolman, C., Lechner, L., & van Dijke, M. (2007). Question order in the assessment of misperception of physical activity. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 4, 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-4-42

  • van Dijke, M., & Poppe, M. (2007). Motivations underlying power dynamics in hierarchically structured groups. Small Group Research, 38, 643-669. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496407304339

  • Verboon, P., & van Dijke, M. (2007). A self-interest analysis of tax compliance: How distributive justice moderates the effect of outcome favorability. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28, 704-727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.09.004

  • De Cremer, D., van Knippenberg, D., van Dijke, M., & Bos, AER. (2006). Self-sacrificial leadership and follower self-esteem: When collective identification matters. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 10, 233-245. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.10.3.233

  • De Cremer, D., van Dijke, M., & Bos, A. (2006). Leader's procedural justice affecting identification and trust. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 27, 554-565. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730610692416

  • Lechner, L., Bolman, C., & van Dijke, M. (2006). Factors related to misperception of physical activity in the Netherlands and implications for health promotion programs. Health Promotion International, 21, 104-112. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dal011

  • van Dijke, M., & Poppe, M. (2006). Striving for personal power as a basis for social power dynamics. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 537-556. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.351

  • De Cremer, D., van Dijke, M., & Bos, AER. (2004). Distributive justice moderating the effects of self-sacrificial leadership. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 25(5), 466-475. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730410544773

  • De Cremer, D., van Knippenberg, D., van Dijke, M., & Bos, A. (2004). How Self-Relevant is Fair Treatment? Social Self-Esteem Moderates Interactional Justice Effects. Social Justice Research, 17, 407-419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-004-2059-x

  • van Dijke, M., & Poppe, M. (2004). Social comparison of power: Interpersonal versus intergroup effects. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 8, 13-26. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.8.1.13

  • van Dijke, M., & Poppe, M. (2003). Preferred changes in power differences: Effects of social comparison in equal and unequal power relations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 149-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00524-3

Professional (5)
  • Dijke, M. (2018). The influence of power on prosocial behaviour. RSM Discovery - Management Knowledge, 33(1), 5-7. http://hdl.handle.net/1765/105615

  • De Cremer, D., Houwelingen, G., Cornelis, I., Hoogervorst, N., Brebels, LGG., van Dijke, M., & Van Hiel, A. (2014). Are leaders fair? On the need to understand fairness management in organizations. European Business Review, July-Augus, 6-8.

  • van Dijke, M., Giessner, S., van Tulder, R., & Gilbert, R. (2014). What value ethical leadership? RSM Discovery - Management Knowledge, 18(2), 8-11. http://hdl.handle.net/1765/77104

  • van Dijke, M. (2013). A broader perspective: Harmonizing leadership activities. RSM Insight, 13(1), 16-17. http://hdl.handle.net/1765/40122

  • De Cremer, D., Leunissen, JM., Reinders Folmer, C., & van Dijke, M. (2012). Sorry limited. Business Strategy Review, 23(3), 76-77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8616.2012.00882.x

Academic (6)
  • van Dijke, M. (2023). Meaning at work: Dimensions, implications, and recommendations. In J. F. Marques (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Fulfillment, Wellness, and Personal Growth at Work (pp. 33-57) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35494-6_3

  • Manjunath, P., & Dijke, M. (2019). Trickle-down effects of unethical behavior: The role of meaning making. In D. Wasieleski, & J. Weber (Eds.), BAS 360 series on Business Ethics Emerald Group Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2514-175920190000003004

  • Dijke, M., van Houwelingen, G., Hoogervorst, N., & Versteegt, L. (2018). Reflection and action: A study on moral learning consultation within Dutch prison authorities. In M. Kowalski (Ed.), Ethics of counterterrorism Boom Uitgevers.

  • van Dijke, M., & de Cremer, D. (2016). Justice in the work setting. In Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research (pp. 315-332). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3216-0_17

  • van Dijke, M., & De Cremer, D. (2014). Justice in the work setting. In C. Sabbagh, & M. Schmitt (Eds.), Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research Springer-Verlag.

  • De Cremer, D., & van Dijke, M. (2009). Acting fairly to be the boss: Procedural justice as a tool to affirm power relationships with subordinates. In D. Tjosvold, & B. M. van Knippenberg-Wisse (Eds.), Power and interdependence in organizations (pp. 118-132). Cambridge University Press.

Professional (4)
  • van Dijke, M., Syroit, J., & Van Ruysseveldt, J. (2009). Trends in selectie. In M. van Dijke, J. Syroit, & J. Van Ruysseveldt (Eds.), Strategisch Selecteren (pp. 263-276). Noordhoff Uitgevers.

  • Könings, K., & van Dijke, M. (2009). Predictoren en criteria. In M. van Dijke, J. Syroit, & J. Van Ruysseveldt (Eds.), Strategisch Selecteren (pp. 59-78). Noordhoff Uitgevers.

  • Proost, K., & van Dijke, M. (2009). Werving van personeel. In M. H. van Dijke, J. Syroit, & J. Van Ruysseveldt (Eds.), Strategisch Selecteren Noordhoff Uitgevers.

  • van Dijke, M., & Proost, K. (2009). Voorselectie. In M. van Dijke, J. Syroit, & J. Van Ruysseveldt (Eds.), Strategisch selecteren (pp. 149-160). Noordhoff Uitgevers.

Popular (1)
  • Joosten, A., van Dijke, M., Van Hiel, A., & De Cremer, D. (2014). Erratum to Being "in Control" May Make You Lose Control: The Role of Self-Regulation in Unethical Leadership Behavior (J Bus Ethics, 10.1007/s10551-013-1686-2). Journal of Business Ethics, 121(1), 147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1757-4

Academic (1)
  • DE SCHUTTER, L., Zheng, M. X., van Dijke, M., & Wu, W. (2023). Time Will Tell or Will it? Power Inequality Hinders Trust Meta-Accuracy Development Over Time. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2023(1). https://doi.org/10.5465/AMPROC.2023.279bp

Professional (3)
  • Desmet, P., Hoogervorst, N., & van Dijke, M. (2015). Profits Vs Principles: Market Competition and Moral Transgression.. Web publication/site, Ideas for Leaders. https://doi.org/10.13007/380

  • Hoogervorst, N., De Cremer, D., & van Dijke, M. (2014). How Employees Win ‘Voice’ and Influence Decisions. Web publication/site, Ideas for Leaders.

  • Stouten, J., van Dijke, M., Mayer, D., De Cremer, D., & Euwema, M. (2014). Can a Leader Be Too Ethical?. Web publication/site, Ideas for Leaders.

Activities

  • Nottingham Business School, Nottingham Trent Univ.
    Start date approval: 07 Nov 2022
    End date approval: 06 Nov 2025
    Place: NOTTINGHAM
    Description: N/A

Courses

Open Science & Scientific Integrity

  • Study year: 2024/2025, 2023/2024, 2022/2023, 2021/2022, 2020/2021
  • Code: BERMSKL022
  • Level: PhD

Philosophy of Science

  • Study year: 2023/2024, 2022/2023, 2021/2022, 2020/2021
  • Code: BK1207
  • Level: Bachelor 1

Sustainability Ethics & Sustainable Behaviour

  • Study year: 2024/2025, 2023/2024, 2018/2019, 2017/2018, 2016/2017, 2015/2016
  • Code: BM03GBS
  • Level: ERIM, Exchange, IM/CEMS, Master

Past courses

Leiderschap, Management en Bestuur

  • Study year: 2021/2022, 2020/2021, 2019/2020, 2018/2019, 2017/2018
  • Code: BMA2109
  • ECTS: 5

LMB1, Leiderschap, management & bestuur

  • Study year: 2021/2022, 2020/2021, 2019/2020, 2018/2019
  • Code: BMA3078
  • ECTS: 6

LMB2, Majorgebonden methodologie Seminar

  • Study year: 2021/2022, 2020/2021, 2019/2020, 2018/2019
  • Code: BMA3079
  • ECTS: 2

Leadership, Sustainability & Governance

  • Study year: 2020/2021, 2019/2020, 2018/2019, 2017/2018
  • Code: BAB29
  • Level: Bachelor 2, Bachelor 2, Pre-master

Leadership, sustainability & governance

  • Study year: 2020/2021, 2019/2020, 2018/2019, 2017/2018
  • Code: BKB3029
  • Level: Bachelor 2, Pre-master

Philosophy of Science

  • Study year: 2019/2020
  • Code: BK1107
  • Level: Bachelor 1

Scientific Integrity

  • Study year: 2019/2020, 2018/2019, 2017/2018, 2016/2017, 2015/2016
  • Code: BERMSKL009
  • ECTS: 1 Level: Master

Publishing Strategy

  • Study year: 2018/2019, 2017/2018, 2016/2017
  • Code: BERMSKL010
  • ECTS: 1 Level: Master

Leadership, Sustainability & Governance

  • Study year: 2017/2018, 2016/2017, 2015/2016, 2014/2015
  • Code: BAB27
  • ECTS: 5 Level: Bachelor 2, Bachelor 2, Pre-master

Leadership, sustainability & governance

  • Study year: 2017/2018, 2016/2017, 2015/2016, 2014/2015
  • Code: BKB2029
  • ECTS: 5 Level: Bachelor 2, Pre-master

Thesis Proposal Writing

  • Study year: 2017/2018, 2016/2017, 2015/2016
  • Code: BERMTP001
  • ECTS: 5 Level: Master

Corporate integrity

  • Study year: 2014/2015
  • Code: RSM04GBS
  • ECTS: 5 Level: Master

ERIM Research Clinic Organising for Performance

  • Study year: 2014/2015
  • Code: BERMRC002
  • ECTS: 4 Level: Master

Featured in the media

  • Work Engagement and Burnout In Anticipation of Physically Returning To Work

    Prof. Marius van Dijk quoted in report about EUR research that finds joy trumps stress in returning to work, but self-doubt can reverse it. Positive anticipation grows closer to return, but self-affirmation can stall that…

  • The impact of leader depletion on leader perforamnce: the mediating role of leaders' trust beliefs and employees' citizenship behaviors

    The ripple effect of leader depletion

  • Hoe wordt extra inzet van de medewerker beïnvloed door macht?

    The Journal of Applied Psychology published an article by Marius van Dijke, Endowed Professor in Behavioral Ethics at RSM, about the influence of power on 'pro-social behaviour', or the extent to which employees do more than what…

  • Nieuw executive-programma leert ethisch leiderschap in business

    RSM's new Executive Programme, 'Ethical Leadership in Business', has been designed to help organisations willing to advance the ethical DNA of their leaders and build and maintain a profoundly ethical culture. RSM Professor Marius…

  • New executive programme teaches ethical leadership in business

    RSM's new executive programme, 'Ethical Leadership in Business' was created to help organisations willing to advance the ethical DNA of their leaders and build and maintain a profoundly ethical culture. This is especially…

  • Klopt dit wel: leidt slecht slapen tot rotgedrag op het werk?

    Steal from the boss, bully peers, arrive too late to the job - all can be caused by sleep deprivation, according to the Rotterdam Professor Marius van Dijke. A new study conducted by Laura Giurge shows that even one bad night…

  • How Leaders Can Gain Trust When They Say Sorry

    Business leaders at all levels are nowadays expected to engage, to understand, to motivate. And not to act as if they were running a Victorian factory or a penal colony.

  • Doodsbang voor de baas

    One in nine workers in the Netherlands have a leadership that behaves unseemly, which according to Marius van Dijke, occurs when somebody exhibits unethical behaviour. The best remedy is to counteract. "It is often better to show…

  • U komt niet weg met alleen maar 'sorry'

    Research conducted by a team of scientists, including Marius van Dijk, found that victims find it difficult to forgive culprits if these have more power than them, as they do not believe in the good intentions surrounding the…

  • Een simpel 'sorry' is niet voldoende

    Research conducted by a team of scientists, including Marius van Dijk, found that victims find it difficult to forgive culprits if these have more power than them, as they do not believe in the good intentions surrounding the…

  • Een manager moet meer doen dan ‘sorry’ zeggen

    Research conducted by a team of scientists, including Marius van Dijk, found that victims find it difficult to forgive culprits if these have more power than them, as they do not believe in the good intentions surrounding the…

  • Sorry is lastig als de baas het zegt

    Research conducted by a team of scientists, including Marius van Dijk, found that victims find it difficult to forgive culprits if these have more power than them, as they do not believe in the good intentions surrounding the…

  • Sorry, maar je komt niet altijd weg met een sorry

    Research conducted by a team of scientists, including Marius van Dijk, found that victims find it difficult to forgive culprits if these have more power than them, as they do not believe in the good intentions surrounding the…

  • BNR Nieuwsradio

    During this radio fragment the research conducted by a team of scientists, including Marius van Dijk and Laura Giurge was discussed. It found that victims find it difficult to forgive culprits if these have more power than them,…

  • Hoge functie? Dan is ‘sorry’ lastig

    Research conducted by a team of scientists, including Marius van Dijk, found that victims find it difficult to forgive culprits if these have more power than them, as they do not believe in the good intentions surrounding the…

  • Wel of geen sorry zeggen op je werk?

    During this radio fragment the research conducted by a team of scientists, including Marius van Dijk and Laura Giurge was discussed. It found that victims find it difficult to forgive culprits if these have more power than them,…

  • Je baas zegt ‘sorry’. En dan?

    Research conducted by a team of scientists, including Marius van Dijk and Laura Giurge, found that victims find it difficult to forgive culprits if these have more power than them, as they do not believe in the good intentions…

  • Belasting betalen in Ethiopië: een kwestie van vertrouwen

    Lemessa Gobena and Marius van Dijke have researched the tax climate in Ethiopia. In an interview with Lemessa Gobena, the way governments use their power appears important for tax payments, but also that the citizens' trust in…

  • Denk mee met je werkgever, ook bij gewetensbezwaren

    Employees are confronted with dilemmas on a daily basis, yet little research has been done on the matter, according to Marius van Dijke. However, some researchers have studied the matter from the perspective and focusing on…

Featured on RSM Discovery

Discovery 39 - The world after COVID-19: how we can do business better

How can we learn from our response to the pandemic to become a more resilient society? This magazine describes business developments and organisational forms that can be beneficial.

RSM Discovery magazine 38 – out now!

Individual CEOs and presidents are leaders, but so are middle managers and team members. This edition of RSM Discovery magazine embodies this diversity in leadership.