Rotterdam school of Management, Erasmus University compact logo

Article: Thursday 17 September

Entrepreneurship is important because it creates new companies, opens up new markets, and nurtures new skills. And there’s lots of research into how entrepreneurs should develop their ideas, but less research on their personal vulnerability in their early stages. What supports or hinders entrepreneurs on this part of the journey? New research reveals that embracing doubt about a business venture rather than fighting it may be the key to entrepreneurial success in the critical early stages. Dr Magdalena Cholakova of Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University (RSM), PhD candidate Umut Yalcin and Professor Costas Andriopoulos of Bayes Business School, University of London wrote Bearing, Belittling or Befriending Doubt: Understanding Doubt’s Generative versus Corrosive Effect on Entrepreneurs’ Early-Stage Idea Validation published in the Academy of Management Journal.

Why Embracing Doubt Fuels Entrepreneurial Success

Doubt is not the enemy

This new research invites a rethink of interpreting and responding to struggles so that doubt no longer deters people, but guides them forward. Existing research into entrepreneurship has assumed that entrepreneurs don’t question their initial ability and motivation to launch an enterprise, once they have decided to pursue it. Instead, such research focuses on questions, directly associated with the validation of the idea behind the enterprise – is it technically feasible, does the market want it, is it financially viable?

“What matters is not whether they experience doubts – they inevitably do,” says Magdalena Cholakova. “It is how they respond to these doubts that then affects the extent to which they can either produce some proof of concept and remain committed to their entrepreneurial goal, or disengage.”

Most vulnerable

This early phase of enterprises, when entrepreneurs are just starting out with their ideas and want to create an initial proof of concept, is well known to be the most vulnerable. The 2025 Global Entrepreneurship Monitor shows over 40 per cent of those seeing good opportunities to start a business would not do so primarily out of fear of failure. 

“We wanted to know what happens psychologically in those first few months when entrepreneurs try to validate their ideas, and what supports people through this uncertain phase,” say the researchers. 

Make sense of setbacks

They followed 35 entrepreneurs during a three-month incubator programme and asked them every week to reflect on their experiences as they strove to validate their initial ideas, and to describe their next steps. “This allowed us to track how they made sense of early setbacks, the types of doubt they experienced, and the type of action they took as a result.”

“We observed that even when facing similar types of challenges, there were differences in how they attributed the setbacks and responded to them. This shaped the type of doubt they experienced, and manifested either as self-doubt, doubts about the idea itself, or both. And this influenced whether or not they made progress, and whether they remained committed to the goal or disengaged.”

Three responses to doubts

The researchers found that entrepreneurs tended to have one of three types of response:

1. Normalising doubt

These entrepreneurs internalise the setbacks and blame themselves for them as a result of perceived lack of abilities – a form of self-doubt. And if they think they cannot improve their competences, the self-doubt lingers and drains their attention away from working on the doubts associated with the idea of the venture. As this limits progress, they might normalise the emotional struggle, telling themselves it’s ‘just part of entrepreneurship’. This leaves them stuck in the bind of wanting to pursue the idea but feeling unable to take action towards it. And then this gradually curbs their commitment to pursuing the idea. A key early signal for this growing disengagement is wishful thinking and daydreaming without setting concrete action steps.

2. Downplaying doubt

This group attributes setbacks to external factors like bad timing, unhelpful feedback, or plain old tough luck. While this helps protect their self-confidence, it also lets them ignore potentially useful critiques that they tend to downplay as unimportant. As a result, they make less targeted progress in refining their ideas, which eventually unravels their interest and commitment to the pursuit of their goal.

A tell-tale sign of disengagement from the real factors affecting progress is procrastination, or putting conditions on exerting efforts in the future until they get some hypothetical external validation.

3. Embracing doubt

These individuals treat both self and idea-related doubts as useful guidance. They attribute setbacks to not having invested enough effort in the right places. And instead of feeling blocked by these doubts or eager to dismiss them, they embrace them. They attend to the surprise that setbacks bring and embrace the ensuing doubts, helping them stretch their existing competences and refine their ideas. These entrepreneurs get enjoyment from the sense of overcoming challenges and from continuously learning, and remain committed to pursuing their goal.

These individuals treat both self and idea-related doubts as useful guidance.

Importantly, this third group doesn’t feel less doubt. They just have a more productive relationship with it, which helps them both develop their ideas further and begin extending their existing personal competences to meet the changing demands of the task. 

Natural and productive

The researchers say their findings show entrepreneurs need to shift how they think about doubt. Rather than treating it as a weakness, it should be seen as a natural and potentially productive part of progress. 

They made three recommendations for creating entrepreneurial business communities that can turn doubt from hindering to helping:

1. Champion productive engagement with doubt.
  1. . Celebrate people who pause and attend to surprising or unexpected outcomes, as this helps them engage with doubt thoughtfully. Build cultures where curiosity, resilience, and reflective learning – rather than just results – are recognised and rewarded.
2. Support people experiencing self-doubt.

Encourage people to see the separation between setbacks (performance) and self-worth. Offer them validation for their efforts, not just their outcomes. Help people reframe setbacks as a signal of not having invested enough effort into the right priorities, rather than as a verdict on their ability.

3. Intervene when overconfidence masks avoidance.

People who blame external factors for negative feedback might preserve their self-image but they fail to learn from their experiences. Gently challenging this helps refine ideas, maintains engagement and improves outcomes.

Reducing the dropouts

The research could be useful against the loss of promising entrepreneurial journeys before they even begin. Spotting the signals of self-doubt, disengagement, or avoidance behaviours early, and developing targeted interventions can support psychological resilience, well-being, and sustained motivation. And what’s more, even though the study was not focused on gender, they observed a concerning pattern: female entrepreneurs were more likely to internalise blame and become trapped in ruminative self-doubt. “This significantly affected their ability to validate their ideas, even when those ideas could have had high potential,” said Dr Cholakova.

The implications of the researchers’ studies go well beyond the world of start-ups. Doubt, disengagement, and internalised failure can appear in any high-stakes, high-uncertainty domain including academia and education. For example, in academia, early-career researchers often face repeated rejection and uncertainty – so much so that many talented individuals question their competence and abandon promising paths. In education, students conditioned to chase outcomes rather than learning and personal growth may disengage at the first signs of struggle, interpreting it as a sign of incompetence rather than a natural part of growth.

The researchers say they hope their work would spur interest in developing tools and interventions aimed at supporting entrepreneurs’ well-being, resilience, and learning orientation in the early stages of idea development.

dr. M.N. (Magdalena) Cholakova
Associate Professor of Entrepreneurship
Rotterdam School of Management (RSM)
Erasmus University Rotterdam
Photo
Magdalena Cholakova

Related articles

RSM Discovery

Want to elevate your business to the next level using the latest research? RSM Discovery is your online research platform. Read the latest insights from the best researchers in the field of business. You can also subscribe to the newsletter to receive a bimonthly highlight with the most popular articles.

Do you want to learn more about this subject?

Check out these RSM education programmes

Your contact for more information:
Danielle Baan

Science Communication and Media Officer

Erasmus University campus in autumn, showcasing its iconic red trees, viewed from across the campus pool.