Rotterdam school of Management, Erasmus University compact logo

Video: Friday, 6 November 2015

During a police operation in response to the terrorist attacks on London in July 2005, the Brazilian electrician Jean Charles de Menezes was mistaken for a suicide terrorist and shot dead in Stockwell tube station. How did a highly skilled team of police specialists come to identify an innocent civilian as a terrorist? In a prize-winning paper, Joep Cornelissen, professor at Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University (RSM), examines how the team’s communication and ‘emotional contagion’ led to a dramatic group decision.

What can teams learn from the Stockwell shooting?

To find out how the team came to label de Menezes as a terrorist and eventually shoot him, Cornelissen looked at police reports of that day and studied transcripts of police communication. “The verbal communication during a time of high alert was subtle – but crucial – in the decision-making process,” says Cornelissen.

The surveillance officer who first noticed de Menezes was never entirely sure he matched the person on the photograph: ‘He is worth a second look,’ he said to his team leader. Despite the fact that police protocol demanded a positive identification, from that moment every observed action of de Menezes was interpreted and described by the other officers in terms of terrorist behaviour. This made it increasingly hard for the team to reconsider other options but to follow their target, resulting in his death.


Emotional contagion

Cornelissen’s analysis further showed that the team’s subconscious psychological framing of reality was supported by ‘emotional contagion’: the distress to be part of a high-profile anti-terrorist operation felt by team members was intensified by the words they used, their tone of voice and their signals during the operation. Sharing the common emotion of nervous anticipation made every team member even more dedicated to end the perceived terrorist threat.

...the quality of team decisions taken under high pressure may suffer from incorrect framing caused by poor communication and emotional contagion.

Interestingly, the team could have picked up on several clues to question their course of action during the operation: de Menezes casually picked up a Metro newspaper, behaviour quite uncharacteristic for a nervous terrorist. By that time however most of the team members were already committed to their mental image of de Menezes as terrorist. The police reports even describe de Menezes as wearing a ‘bulky jacket’ (supposedly stuffed with bombs). In actual fact, he was wearing an open denim jacket.


High-pressure team decisions

Prof. Cornelissen demonstrates that the quality of team decisions taken under high pressure may suffer from incorrect framing caused by poor communication and emotional contagion. These mechanisms restrict critical self-assessment and leave little room for constructive dissent. Ultimately they can lead to poor judgement in organisations. “By focusing on a dramatic, high-profile case this study also offers insights and pointers for questions of leadership, improvisation, and effective communication within other, less challenging contexts,” Cornelissen concludes.

prof.dr. J.P (Joep) Cornelissen
Professor of Corporate Communication and Management
Rotterdam School of Management (RSM)
Erasmus University Rotterdam
Photo
Joep Cornelissen
Pile of books with vibrant bookmarks protruding from various pages, symbolizing in-depth research.

Related articles

RSM Discovery

Want to elevate your business to the next level using the latest research? RSM Discovery is your online research platform. Read the latest insights from the best researchers in the field of business. You can also subscribe to the newsletter to receive a bimonthly highlight with the most popular articles.

Do you want to learn more about this subject?

Check out these RSM education programmes

Reputation Management

Reputation Management

  • 10 Oct 2024
  • 4 days
  • 3,400
Corporate Responsibility

Corporate Responsibility

  • 18 Nov 2024
  • 3 days
  • 3,400
Winter Foundation Course in Corporate Communication

Winter Foundation Course in Corporate Communication

  • 30 Jan 2025
  • 5 days
  • 3,950
Organisational Change

Organisational Change

  • 11 Nov 2024
  • 3 days
  • 3,400
Issues Management & Public Affairs

Issues Management & Public Affairs

  • 7 Apr 2025
  • 3 days
  • 3,400
Diploma Programme in General Management

Diploma Programme in General Management

  • 14 Oct 2024
  • 1 year
    • €14,825 -
    • €15,425 depending on modules chosen *
    • * see details on the page
Leadership and Communication

Leadership and Communication

  • 3 Jun 2025
  • 3 days
  • 3,400
Advanced Management and Leadership Programme

Advanced Management and Leadership Programme

  • 2 Sept 2024
  • 15/16 days
  • 16,500
Employee Communication

Employee Communication

  • 14 May 2025
  • 3 days
  • 3,400
Digital Communication

Digital Communication

  • 9 Dec 2024
  • 3 days
  • 3,400
Co-creation & Stakeholder Engagement

Co-creation & Stakeholder Engagement

  • 3 days
  • 3,400
Crisis Communication

Crisis Communication

  • 3 days
  • 3,400
Summer Foundation Course in Corporate Communication

Summer Foundation Course in Corporate Communication

  • 16 Jun 2025
  • 4 days
  • 5,550
Finance for Communication Professionals

Finance for Communication Professionals

  • 3 days
  • 3,400
Corporate Branding

Corporate Branding

  • 3 days
  • 3,400
Strategic Communication

Strategic Communication

  • 30 Sept 2024
  • 3 days
  • 3,400

Your contact for more information:

Danielle Baan

Science Communication and Media Officer

Portrait of Erika Harriford-McLaren

Erika Harriford-McLaren

Corporate Communications & PR Manager

Erasmus University campus in autumn, showcasing its iconic red trees, viewed from across the campus pool.